Meetings
Transcript: Select text below to play or share a clip
[Rep. Matthew Birong (Chair)]: No, I was feeling the same thing. Just wanted to understand. I just wanted clarity with your intent.
[Nick (Legislative Counsel)]: So right now, a landlord could say no smoking, no vaping, right, of tobacco products. So that they can do right now. Okay, that's fine. That's correct. The challenge, so here effectively what you're doing is you're specifically allowing or preventing a landlord from not allowing renters to consume edible cannabis products. So, it's a different way of looking at it.
[Rep. Matthew Birong (Chair)]: Rep. Govind.
[Rep. Govind]: So, I understand that. They would still allow cannabis use products that are edibles in the apartment, but by what the clarifying language would make it clear that it would be for the inhalation part would be they could prohibit it.
[Rep. Matthew Birong (Chair)]: That is the understanding.
[Rep. Govind]: With the language you just
[Nick (Legislative Counsel)]: Right. That was the language that was discussed before the Bernie to be added in.
[Rep. Matthew Birong (Chair)]: Adding that language in and around the, like, inlets, not just lighted, makes it more, offers more clarity. And I guess discussion, comment, thoughts? I think I'm comfortable with that addition. I'm comfortable with. Consistency, favorable funds. Okay, it's very favorable for that addition.
[Nick (Legislative Counsel)]: And then just to be clear, if that change is made in section 30, I would also make it in section 31 at the very bottom of page 30. Yes. Two
[Rep. Matthew Birong (Chair)]: instances of the same language. And how long before clean property for a possible vote?
[Nick (Legislative Counsel)]: How long before I can get this done, I could do it right away? Alright,
[Rep. Matthew Birong (Chair)]: committee. Let's take a ten let's break until 11:25, if that's enough time, counsel. Okay. Wonderful. Thank you, Nick. Take us off till 11:25, and then